<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mac OS X Leopard (10.5) security: firewall analysis</title>
	<link>http://www.inftoint.com/medium/publications/mac-os-x-leopard-105-security-firewall-analysis/</link>
	<description>Information Systems Management and Security</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anti Virus Software &#187; Mac OS X Leopard (10.5) security: firewall analysis</title>
		<link>http://www.inftoint.com/medium/publications/mac-os-x-leopard-105-security-firewall-analysis/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Anti Virus Software &#187; Mac OS X Leopard (10.5) security: firewall analysis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.inftoint.com/medium/publications/mac-os-x-leopard-105-security-firewall-analysis/#comment-90</guid>
		<description>[...] unknown article is very informativeHere&#8217;s a small piece of the storyLeopard should have introduced 11 new security features, among them the firewall should have been re-worked. However as pointed in the leopard security firewall analysis by heise Security It appears that there is still some problems &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] unknown article is very informativeHere&#8217;s a small piece of the storyLeopard should have introduced 11 new security features, among them the firewall should have been re-worked. However as pointed in the leopard security firewall analysis by heise Security It appears that there is still some problems &#8230; [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
